The brutal stream of assaults on Asian Americans does not occur in a vacuum. While leaders have issued statements decrying anti-Asian attacks, they have largely ignored the underlying structural racism that facilitates them. Asian Americans are born in the United States, or have chosen to make their home here, yet are still perpetually categorized as “foreign” or “other." This status renders the entire community vulnerable to not only physical, but also economic and cultural violence.
Physical violence: targeting Asians in America
Violent terror against people of Asian descent has occurred throughout American history. Asian immigrants were, and still are, seen as “other”—cheap labor, sex objects, or competitivethreats—but never fully human.
Workers from Canton constructed half the Trans-Continental railroad that linked the country together, and Chinese miners helped towns boom throughout the West. By 1870, Chinese made up 20% of California’s workforce and nearly 30% of Idaho’s total population. Despite these contributions, White workers lynched, massacred, and violently expelled their Asian neighbors without repercussion, while politicians capitalized on “Yellow Peril” xenophobia to ban immigration from Asian nations, including China, India, Japan, Korea, and Southeast Asia.
During World War II, Japanese Americans’ perceived “foreignness” was used to justify seizing their property and forcibly imprisoning them in camps. Now in the 21st century, repeated attacks against Asian American elders and the ongoing surge in hate incidents offer a reminder that even if laws change, physical violence remains a threat.
Economic violence: harming and displacing communities
Beyond physical harm, structural racism also manifests as economic violence. Asian-owned businesses have been especially hard-hit during the pandemic: financial woes have been coupled with misplaced fears blaming Asian Americans for spreading coronavirus, leading to hate crimes. In Chinatowns, Koreatowns, Little Manilas and Little Saigons, businesses have suffered higher rates of closure, and some have been excluded from government relief efforts. Even before the pandemic, historical Asian neighborhoods from San Francisco to Chicago to Boston were already threatened by gentrification.
In the face of inaction by those in power, Asian Americans must save themselves. With the rise of pandemic-related racism, volunteer-led community safety programs in Seattle, San Francisco and New York have emerged. Intergenerational efforts in Oakland’s Chinatown and Japantown in San Jose are pairing younger chaperones with elders to ensure their physical safety.
Cultural violence: erasing Asian languages and heritage
A third way structural racism manifests is through cultural and linguistic violence: destroying a people by denying them their history. The American story as taught in schools has centered Whites, while neglecting the histories and contributions of minorities. This relegates Asian American experiences to “other” stories outside the national narrative—a phenomenon unsurprisingly replicated in workplaces and government.
Asian American Studies programs combat cultural violence by offering a richer understanding of U.S. history and transferring knowledge about Asian experiences across generations, but they remain underfunded and hard to find.
Another potent form of cultural erasure is to deny minorities access to their heritage languages. When societies fail to protect minority tongues, and a dominant language crowds out space for linguistic diversity, underserved communities are further marginalized. Yet thriving multilingual societies throughout the world show this is not inevitable, and can benefit tremendously from diversity.
Today, ethnic studies and language programs face cancellation by universities eager to trim COVID-impacted budgets. Asian American activists lobbied to create these programs and must now mobilize to protect them.
At Stanford University, our alma mater, White administrators made budget cuts that impacted language courses in Vietnamese, Filipino, and Cantonese. This is especially egregious given Stanford’s history: Leland Stanford founded the university using wealth built on the backs of Cantonese railroad workers. Thousands have signed our petition to #SaveCantonese at Stanford.
The University’s response—a minimal offer to restore two classes taught by an hourly wage instructor—parallels history by treating Asians as cheap labor. University administrators espouse diversity and inclusion, yet fail to invest in the programs that actually serve Asian American communities.
Decision-making must include Asian Americans
We must work to proactively fix problems at their source. Full inclusion in city planning and urban policymaking can prevent Asian neighborhoods from becoming economic casualties to gentrification. Investing in Asian American Studies and language education directly counters ongoing cultural violence and erasure.
A basic, but critical, step is for non-Asian leaders to include Asian Americans in decisions that affect our community. They must also treat Asian American issues as core to their institutional mission—not merely an afterthought. Symbolic words of support in times of crisis are meaningless, unless they are backed by a track record of inclusion and action. Otherwise, when Asian voices are silenced, and Asian lives are treated as inconsequential, domestic terrorists can easily target them for outright elimination.
Asian Americans and other minorities are part of the fabric of America, and have been for centuries. They are not waiting for an outside hero to rescue them—they are eager to save their own communities, just as they have done before. Across the country, grassroots, community-led efforts are pushing back against a system that robs Asian Americans of their lives, their livelihoods, and their history. We must follow their lead and let Asian Americans claim their right to a violence-free future.
About the Authors
Dr. Jamie Tam is an assistant professor at the Yale School of Public Health and Stanford alumna, Class of 2010.
Kevin Hsu graduated from Stanford with undergraduate degreesin Earth Systems and International Relations and a Master’s in Civil &Environmental Engineering.
Tao Large is a PhD Candidate in the Stanford Departmentof Chemistry.
Vicki Sun graduated from Stanford with an undergraduate degreein Comparative Literature and a Master’s in International Education Policy and Evaluation.
Maciej Kurzynski is a PhD Candidate in Chinese at Stanford.
Ryan Talvola is an undergraduate economics student at UCLA.
Save Cantonese is a global community-driven movement that promotes Cantonese language and cultural preservation through advocacy. Our campaign was launched in 2020 in response to budget cuts that eliminated funding for the only salaried, benefits-eligible Cantonese lecturer position at Stanford University. Since then, our sibling campaign has joined the fight to restore Cantonese language classes at City College of San Francisco. Find out more about our organization at www.savecantonese.org or by following @savecantonese on Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter.